I just finished watching The Secret. What is The Secret? It is feature length movie about The Law of Attraction. As inspiring as this movie was, there was this critical voice inside of me saying how incomplete it was. I truly want to believe in this principle and to a great extent I do. In certain phases of my life it has been a consistent and worthwhile practice. Unfortunately, it comes with that critical voice. So for my own benefit, I’ve decided to see how the law of attraction can fit into my current worldview.
The Law of Attraction states that you are a living magnet. You attract whatever is dominant in your thoughts and feelings. This makes total sense to a certain degree. If I’m feeling bad then I’m having a bad experience. And changing my feelings will create a different type of experience. It’s the same with thoughts I’m having. I’m attracting experiences that mirror my inner thoughts.
Pretty simple stuff. But it’s a reductionist principle. It collapses everything to the upper left quadrant, or the interior of the individual. And it collapses everything to the level of mind. Everything is determined by my thinking. Obviously this isn’t completely true.
So I’ll try to hack through the Law of Attraction according to the AQAL model. But to begin, I’ll stop calling it a law and instead view it as a general principle. If you’re new to integral theory and would like to know more, this pdf a good place to start: Integral Operating System. Also, wikipedia has some good information. Try these links: Integral Philosophy and Integral Thought.
Quadrants
I won’t fully explain the four quadrants here but I will make a couple of points. I already mentioned the reduction of everything to the UL (Upper Left: Individual Interior). Since I am a holon, reducing everything to a single part of my whole doesn’t support an integral principle of attraction. We can agree that there are internal, external, individual, and collective contributions to our existence. There are multiple perspectives to what we attract and what we want to attract.
Lines
How would lines of development relate to an integral law of attraction? I’m going to have a better chance of attracting the health and fitness that I want if I have a highly developed kinesthetic sense. I believe The Secret and proponents of the law of attraction have a good grasp of lines. Maybe not complete, but at least they ask you to think beyond money and things into relationships, health, and so on.
I believe linguistic intelligence is one of the most important lines to develop in an integral law of attraction. How we state what we want is just as important as figuring out what we want. Affirmations are an art. Subtle verb shifts can open our perspective and put things in their appropriate place on our time lines. Many self-help gurus will tell you to make everything present tense. “I weigh 50 pounds, am 8 feet tall, and a trillionaire.” Uh, I think not.
If your goal is to become a millionaire and you were to model a millionaire’s thinking on the path to completing this goal, you would find shifts in thinking and language patterns that occur over time. When I have a million dollars, I can affirm that I’m a millionaire. When I have $750,000 I can affirm that I’m close to being a millionaire. When I have $100 I can be creative and affirm, “I accept any idea that would be worth $1,000,000 or more.” These affirmations don’t create cognitive dissonance and are still extremely effective in focusing our thoughts.
Levels or Stages
Ken Wilber discusses this subject in Grace and Grit (pgs. 261-263):
For example, if you get hit by a bus and break a leg, that’s a physical illness with physical remedies: you set the leg and plaster it. That’s a “same-level” intervention. You don’t sit in the street and visualize your leg mending. That’s a mental-level technique that isn’t effective in this physical-level problem. Moreover, if you are told by those around you that your thoughts alone caused this accident, and that you should be able to mend the leg yourself with your thoughts, then all that is going to happen is that you will feel guilt, self-blame, and low self-esteem. It’s a complete mismatch of levels and treatments.
On the other hand, if you do happen to suffer frrom, say, low self-esteem, because of certain scripts that you have internalized about how rotten or incompentent you are, that is a mental-level problem that responds well to a mental-level intervention such as visualization or affirmations (script rewriting, which is exactly what cognitive therapy does). Using physical-level interventions–taking megavitamins, say, or changing your diet–is not going to have much effect (unless you actually have a vitamin imbalance contributing to the problem). And if you only try to use physical-level treaments, you are going to end up in some form of despair, because the treatments are from the wrong level and they just don’t work very well.
So the general approach to any disease, in my opinion, is to start at the bottom and work up. First, look for physical causes. Exhaust those to the best of your ability. Then move up to any possible emotional causes, and exhaust those. Then mental, then spiritual.
He makes a couple other important points:
What is not helpful is taking the fact that these psychological and spiritual aspects can be very useful, and then saying that the reason you broke your leg is that you lacked these psychologcal and spiritual facets in the first place. A person suffering any major illness may make significant and profound changes in the face of that illness; it does not follow that they got the illness because they lacked the changes. That would be like saying, if you have a fever and you take aspirin the fever goes down; therefore having a fever is due to an aspirin deficiency.
Now most diseases, of course, don’t originate from a single and isolated level. Whatever happens on one level or dimension of being affects all the other levels to a greater or lesser degree. One’s emotional, mental, and spiritual makeup can most definitely influence physical illness and physical healing, just as a physical illness can have strong repercussions on the higher levels. Break your leg, and it will probably have emotional and psychological effects. In systems theory this is called “upward causation”–a lower level is causing certain events in a higher level. And the reverse, “downward causation,” is when a higher level has a causal effect or influence on the lower.
The question, then, is just how much “downward causation” does the mind–do our thoughts and emotions–have on physical illness? And the answer seems to be: much more than was once thought, not nearly as much as new agers believe.
So the wisdom of downward causation comes into play during the exit of a completely reductionist rational worldview level into a higher-level integration of the mind and body. Using Spiral Dynamics terms, it’s a move from orange to green. But what usually happens when one enters this new stage is everything gets reduced again to a single perspective. It happened in The Secret and most attraction gurus tend to reduce everything to the level of mind. What The Bleep did something similar. I believe this movie could be important for someone at a purely rational level of development to widen their perspective but someone of an even higher more integrated level would see this as gross reductionism.
States
For me, this is where it gets fun. Who doesn’t love an altered state? Lucid dreaming, visualization, and subtle body exercises like Qigong, help us to expand and focus our energy. Every attraction guru will tell you to visualize your goals regularly and I believe it’s damn good advice.
It seems to me that the nondual state is where the two truths doctrine shows up, recognizing my relative and absolute self. A common attraction technique is to become grateful for what you have while at the same time striving to improve your life. This attraction hack is said to help you achieve your dreams faster. A deeper interpretation is to recognize your ever-present self that cannot be found because it was never lost while simultaneously improving your relative self.
Types
Types are a useful tool when it comes to the principle of attraction. They can help us take different perspectives. We can use the Enneagram to predict the issues that may come up in our personalities and then design outcomes in accordance to our Enneagram type. Masculine/feminine and yin/yang typology can help to balance our relationship to attraction. I give and receive. I let go while acting.
In conclusion, while most of the AQAL model can be used to enrich our understanding of attraction, there are really only a couple of major changes that must occur. First, include all quadrants. No more gross reduction to the individual interior. Second, transcend and include all levels. No more gross reduction to the level of mind.
There. My critical voice has done its job. I can believe in attraction again. Did I miss anything?
Andy Smith says
Thanks Graham,
That’s clarified things for me. I’ll be directing my fellow coaches and Attraction fans towards this article.
Best wishes,
Andy Smith
Graham English says
I’m happy to help. 🙂
As I said, I can believe in attraction again. But I can’t reduce everything to attraction.
Adie DeCoursey says
Hi, Graham
I was pointed at the article by Andy Smith. Like him, I found the article (and the links) very useful.
I’ve never really been able to reduce EVERYTHING to attraction, but I do believe in the idea in general terms and it’s certainly something I’ll continue to talk to my coaching clients about.
Cheers, Adie DeCoursey
Graham English says
Thanks, Adie. Wait until Ken Wilber’s Integral Spirituality comes out in a couple of weeks. I think his concept of “tetra-arising” will be especially useful to the idea of attraction.
Graham English says
UPDATE: Integral Spirituality is on Amazon.
~C4Chaos says
“Pretty simple stuff. But it’s a reductionist principle. It collapses everything to the upper left quadrant, or the interior of the individual.”
this is an excellent analysis from an integral POV. you nailed it bro 🙂
check out the discussion on my blog post on Zaadz. i linked to your blog post from where 🙂
http://coolmel.zaadz.com/blog/2007/2/the_secret_epilogue
take care and stay lucid,
~C
Graham English says
Thanks for the link. I’ll check your post out. BTW, I’m glad that The Secret is all the rage right now. It’s a sign that people are ready to grow. And even with all The Secret messiness, there’s some good that can come out of it. Most people will try the LOA out and find it hopelessly lacking at some point in their transformation and will move on. IOS is the next step.
Adie says
Hi, Graham
Just re-read your article.
Personally, I’m not a huge fan of affirmations, for some of the reasons you describe. I guess they have their place in certain contexts. I do like the idea of setting intentions though, which are more concerned with daily states.
I’m wondering if/how some of the concepts described in NLP (Richard Bandler’s “Meta Model” – particularly as described by Michael Breen – Robert Dilts’s “Logical Levels” and that way of describing State) fit in with all this. On the face of it, they seem complementary.
I’ve certainly heard Breen and Bandler describe NLP as an operating system.
“…the general approach to any disease, in my opinion, is to start at the bottom and work up. First, look for physical causes. Exhaust those to the best of your ability. Then move up to any possible emotional causes, and exhaust those. Then mental, then spiritual.”
Not entirely sure about this… It seems to me that it might be at least as useful to work on all “levels” at the same time. Certainly if someone has a physical illness or injury there may be a connection (causal or not) to beliefs they may hold. Wouldn’t working on the beliefs at the same time as the physical symptoms at the very least improve their state and make them more receptive to treatment?
This isn’t a view, it’s a question. I’m happy to be convinced otherwise.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Adie
Graham English says
What you say makes sense, Adie, It does make sense to work on all levels. Bandler and Breen got it right, IMO. But as Ken points out in Grace and Grit, if you have a broken leg, it makes the most sense to have a physical intervention, not a psychic one.
The Meta Model is a language tool. With it, you can gather information, clarify meaning, identify limits, and give choices. Which makes it a wonderful psychological/intellectual tool. It really is amazing how much of people’s contractions is a result of their use of language.
Neuro-Logical Levels are considered in NLP to be a Meta-Program. Specifically, these levels are categories of experience. In integral terms, I would consider them to be a typology that has a built in hierarchy. They are not stages or levels that must sequentially arise. You might also consider each of these to be a line of development. NLP is a mess in its organization of principles. That’s why I just consider them a powerful set of tools for change.
If you’re doing change work with someone or yourself, the neuro-logical levels are very useful. You can identify in what “level” a challenge is centered and then use the appropriate intervention. It also makes a good check list to go through as you’re doing any kind of life planning or need some motivation.
Neuro-Logical Levels
Identity: Be, Who
Beliefs: Have, Why
Capabilities: Know, How
Behavior: Do, What
Environment: Be, Where/When
I use both the Meta Model and Neuro-Logical Levels probably the most out of any NLP tools so I’m glad you asked about them. Thanks! 🙂
Franxbudi says
You are Right Graham,
Law of attraction is so poweful.Btw please allow me to take this article and I make link to your blog.
Peace,
Franxbudi
Graham English says
Thanks for the comment, Franxbudi. A link would be greatly appreciated.
Duff says
Nice AQAL analysis, Graham. However I also believe that The Secret is not just partial, but unhealthy.
As I like to say, The Secret is “radical narcissistic subjectivist reductionist white privilege American pseudo spiritualism.”
Starving mothers in Africa need more than a positive attitude to improve their situation.
But all else being equal, thinking about what you want can often be useful.
Graham English says
The aftermath of The Secret has definitely been unhealthy. The Oprah fiasco was extreme. But we still have to remember that the LOA is a step up for many. Some people never even consider their intentions. So the way I figure it is, The Secret opens doors to the LOA. The LOA usually ends up being outgrown and integrated into a deeper worldview. It’s just a rung on the ladder. One that nobody can escape.
Now, since I know you, if you were to start hyping The Secret. I would definltely say you regressed! 🙂
Luke says
I too have a similar view on The Secret. I also think there is more to it than what is being described. Jerry and Esther Hicks make a lot more sense to me. But what I find profound is that I found this site through some blogs posts. I have been wanting some information for some time on NLP. I have looked on the internet, but everything is so expensive. Are there any resources you can point me to, or books that I can read to learn some of these tools?
Graham English says
Luke, you could dig around my site for NLP info. I have lots of HowTos on here. Also check my NLP wiki.
Adie says
Post-liberal. I think I can use that.
Referring to Luke, there are lots of NLP schools about, particularly here in London. I suggest that, regardless of cost, he takes the time to research them before choosing one.
I wouldn’t recommend trying to learn it from a book, although your wiki is a great introduction.
Graham English says
Thanks for the comment Adie. 🙂
Law of Attraction User says
Thats an interesting way of looking at the LOA. Interesting.
mymyth says
I enjoyed your article, even though I admit I need to read Wilber to understand it fully. I sense I agree with you almost completely, though. I recently read Epictetus’ handbook (The Enchirdion), and I highly respect his thoughts, although I smiled inside at the cold reception his Stoic philosophies would have to die-hard modern fans of the Law of Attraction. Ken Wilber is on my book list now, and I’m excited to integrate the Law of Attraction into a form that I can more easily accept at all levels.
Graham English says
A Theory of Everything is a great place to start.