Can Hit Songs Really Be Reduced To Science? I Mean, Really? by Graham English

Can Hit Songs Really Be Reduced To Science? I Mean, Really?

February 15, 2006

In the news right now: The Science of Hit Songs:

People pick favorites largely on what others have deemed popular, a new study finds.

The study itself may be new but the principle isn’t. Robert Cialdini, Ph.D., in an academic setting, created the 6 principles of ethical influence many years ago. One of them is the principle of consensus or social proof.

It makes complete sense having the truth about something tested and agreed upon by your peers. In fact, it’s the scientific method. And if consensus in the field of chemistry comes from a group of chemistry experts. Where does the consensus for a hit song come from?

Who are the hit song experts?

It had to start with just one person. One listen. Who was that first person and what happened to spread the virus to the next person, and the next and so on? Stay tuned for upcoming tips and tricks on how to create buzz and unleash the ideavirus.

For now, I’m going to scale the question down a bit because a hit song feels a bit out of my reach right now. Maybe after some experience as a hit songwriter I’ll be able to answer that question. For now, I’ll reverse engineer–something I love to do–a different and more concrete goal.

What do I want to be able to do? Maybe I’ll create a popular podcast.

Hmmm. New question: where does the consensus for a popular podcast come from?

Since I believe podcasting is the most important thing every musician should be doing right now–and my own podcasting has been irregular at best–my objective is to be one of the most popular podcasts in a specific category of a specific podcast directory. As research, I’ll determine the podcast directory and category. I’ll also research what podcasts are already popular and see if there are any footprints to follow.

In the mean time, I’ll record a weekly songwriting tips podcast. Next action: Mix my current podcast.

Of course, I will share any and all duplicatable patterns that I find along the way. Are you podcasting yet? Do you have any advice or any questions about how to create a popular podcast?

ShareThis

If you want to be notified the next time I post something, sign up for email alerts or subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

(No Ratings Yet)

Loading ...

Hi Graham. I just found your website today via a “what is music?” search alert from Google.

The question of whether or not musical preference is determined by social proof is distinct from whether or not musical preference can be accounted for scientifically.

With regard to the dependence of individual musical preference on the preferences of others, I have written an article “Are Musical Items Intrinsically Musical?” at http://www.1729.com/blog/IsMusicalityIntrinsic.html, which states an opposing point of view - that there is a substantial and irreducible component of musical preference which is completely independent of anyone else’s musical preference.

As for the more general question, whether or not music can be explained scientifically, the answer to that is enough to fill a whole book, which, as it happens, I have written, and it can be downloaded and read from http://whatismusic.info/. I would be interested to hear what you think of the ideas in my book (and if you manage to finish the book, there is also a lot of additional material I have posted on my websites since I wrote the book).

4 comments on “Can Hit Songs Really Be Reduced To Science? I Mean, Really?”

- MrD said:
- Jun 2nd, 2007 at 11:35 am
Please take some time to think about music and colour. What do you think, and do you use any keys and scales based on their different sounds?
Would you be interested in finding out more with the theory that we listen to colours in music?
Thanks
MrD

- Graham English said:
- Jun 3rd, 2007 at 11:53 am
Using scales based on their different sounds is pretty obvious. If I want minor, I use minor. If I want major, I use major. Keys can be more subtle. But I don’t have any coherent theory. And I’ll transpose things around just see how it sounds different. But I try to play what I hear in my imagination first.

When you say “colours,” are you referring to actual colors like blue and red or are you using the word as a metaphor?

- Philip Dorrell said:
- Jan 12th, 2008 at 5:02 pm
Hi Graham. I just found your website today via a “what is music?” search alert from Google.

The question of whether or not musical preference is determined by social proof is distinct from whether or not musical preference can be accounted for scientifically.

With regard to the dependence of individual musical preference on the preferences of others, I have written an article “Are Musical Items Intrinsically Musical?” at http://www.1729.com/blog/IsMusicalityIntrinsic.html, which states an opposing point of view - that there is a substantial and irreducible component of musical preference which is completely independent of anyone else’s musical preference.

As for the more general question, whether or not music can be explained scientifically, the answer to that is enough to fill a whole book, which, as it happens, I have written, and it can be downloaded and read from http://whatismusic.info/. I would be interested to hear what you think of the ideas in my book (and if you manage to finish the book, there is also a lot of additional material I have posted on my websites since I wrote the book).

- Graham English said:
- Jan 14th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
Great comment, Philip! Thanks for sharing. I’ll be taking a deeper look at
your site when I have more time. Cheers!

Graham English

4 comments on “Can Hit Songs Really Be Reduced To Science? I Mean, Really?”

Favorite Tags

Highest Rated

Latest Entries

Related Entries